Assessment of Duckweed Supplement Diet to Fishmeal on the Growth Performance of Oreochromis niloticus Fingerlings

E. Wanderi, R. Olendi

Abstract


Oreochromis niloticus is the most cultured fish in tropical freshwater aquaculture systems and second most cultured fish after carps in the world. In Kenya, Oreochromis niloticus has potential in eradicating hunger and poverty but this is limited because of its low yield attributed to unavailability of quality, reliable and affordable farm-made feeds, and a problem that needs to be addressed. Initiatives geared towards improving Oreochromis niloticus production but main challenges still remain to be cost implication in the production of feeds. This study aims at addressing feed costs challenges by the use of an alternative locally available feeds to replace the expensive commercially produced feeds. The study was to study was conducted at Dominion farm situated in Siaya County along the shores of Lake Victoria in Western Kenya. The main objective was to assess the effects of locally available duckweed diet on growth performance of O. niloticus fingerlings. 450 experimental sexed reversed male fingerlings of mean weight 3.1±0.10 and length of17.44±0.42 mm were randomly distributed in three concrete circular tanks of 500 litres capacity each with two replicates.  In each tank, 50 fingerlings were stocked and fed with a food ration of 5% body weight for 72 days. The fingerlings were fed in the morning at 9.00 am and evening 4.00 pm daily using a dry duckweed meal, fishmeal and control diet. Sampling was done biweekly where length and weight gain of the fingerlings were obtained using a measuring board and weighing scale respectively. Average weight at the end of the experiment for duckweed, 50% dry duckweed diet-50% fishmeal diet and control were 56.03±1.15 59.54±0.31, 66.73±1.79, respectively. The dry duckweed diet influence on the growth parameters was less than fishmeal diets. However, at the ratio of 1:1 duckweed to fishmeal diet, the weight gain was significant. There was a significant difference in FCR, PER, AWG, and SR (p<0.05) when fingerlings were fed with three diets. Oreochromis niloticus showed an increase in growth performance during the entire period. This result indicates that dry duckweed can be used to minimize the high cost of fishmeal without negatively affecting fish growth.


Keywords


Duckweed, Fishmeal, Oreochromis niloticus, fingerlings, growth

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahammad, M. U., Swapon, M. S. ., Yeasmin, T. U., Raham, M. S. & Ali, S. M. (2003). Replacement of Sesame oil cake by Duckweed (Lemna minor) in Broiler Diet.Pakistan. Journal of Biological Science, 6(16), 1450–1453.

AOAC (2000). Approved methods of the American Association chemist. In Association chemist (12th Ed.). MN USA: AOAC, and St. Paul.

Chaturvedi, K. M., Langote, D. S. & Asolekar, R. S. (2003). Duckweed-fed fisheries for treatment of low strength community waste water. WWWTM Newsletter. India: Asian Insttitute of Technology.

Dagne, A., Degefu, F. & Lakew, A. (2013). Comparative growth performance of mono-sex and mixed-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) in pond culture system at Sebeta. Ethiopia International Journal of Aquaculture, 3, 30–34.

De Silva, S. S. & Anderson, T. A. (1995). Fish nutrition in aquaculture. London, UK: Chapman and Hall.

El-Sayed, A.F. M. (2004). Protein Nutrition of Farmed Tilapia: Searching for Unconventional Sources. In R.B. Bolivar, G. C. Mair, & K. Fitzsimmons (Eds.), New Dimensins on Farmed Tilapia’ Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture 12-16 September 2004 (pp. 12–16). Manila, Philippines: ISTA Publications.

FAO. (2010). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2010. FAO, Rome.

Fasakin, E. A., Balogun, A. M. & Fagbenro, O. A. (2001). Evaluation of sun dried water fern Azolla Africana and duckweed, Spirodellapolyrrhiza, in practical diets for Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus fingerlings. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 11(4), 83–92.

Glencross, B. D., Booth, M. & Allan, G. L. (2007). A feed is only as good as its ingredients - A review of ingredient evaluation strategies for aquaculture feeds. Aquaculture Nutrition, 13(1), 17–34.

Granoth, R. & Porath, D. (1983). An attempt to optimize feed utilization by tilapia in flow-through aquaculture. International Symposium of Tilapia in Aquaculture, Tel Aviv, Israel, 550-558.

Gupta, M. M. & Acosta., B. O. (2001). Development of global partnerships for fish genetics research - A success story. Paper presented at the Technical Workshop on Methodologies, Organization and Management of Global Partnership Programmes, (pp. 9–10). Rome, Italy.

Hassan, M. S. & Edwards, P. (1992). Evaluation of duckweed (L. PerpusillaandSpirodela polyrriza) as feed for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture, 104, 315-326.

Hillman, W. & Culley, D. D. (1978). The use of duckweed. American Scientist, 66, 442-451.

KMFRI (2017). Kenya’s Aquaculture Brief (2017). Status, Trends, Challenges and Future Outlook. Kenya Marine and Fisheries Research Institute, Mombasa, Kenya., 12.

Leng, R. A., Stambolie, J. H. & Bell, R. (1995). Duckweed a potential high protein feed resource’ for domestic animals and fish. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 7(1).

SAS, I. (2015). Discovering JMP 12®. SAS Inst (13th ed.). SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.

Shelton, W. L. & Popma, T. J. (2006). Biology. In Tilapia: Biology, Culture, and Nutrition. In C.E. Lim & C. D. Webster (Eds.), In Tilapia: Biology, Culture, and Nutrition (pp. 1–49). Binghamton, NY, USA: Haworth Press:

Skilicorn, P. W., Spira, W. & Journey, W. (1993). Duckweed aquaculture: a new aquatic farming for developing countries., 15-25.

Tacon, A. G. J., Hasan, M. R. & Subasinghe, R. P. (2006). Use of fishery resources as feed inputs for aquaculture development: trends and policy implications. FAO Fisheries Circular. No.1018 (Vol. 99). Rome: FAO.

Tavares, F. A., J., B., Rodrigues, R., Fracalossi, D. M., Esquivel, J. & R., R. (2008). Dried duckweed and commercial feed promote adequate growth performance of tilapia fingerlings. Biotemas, 21(3), 91–97.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© 2015 School of Environmental Studies all rights reserved. Permission should be sought from the publishers before any of this work or part of it is reproduced, transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, microfilming and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system.